PikminFanon talk:Ranks

Badges to userboxes?
Now that Userboxes exist, should these badges be turned into userboxes, or stay the same? --Yoshord 23:29, June 4, 2010 (UTC)


 * I agree, it seems to clutter up userpages. --


 * Yeah, I think so too. I also really wish he would've talked to us about this first, so we could give our two-cents, but it works for now. So I'm just gonna start assimilating the rank images to the userbox towers.

Volatile Dweevil's Ideas
I like the idea of ranks, and I had a couple of ideas.

Idea #1 - Instead of having two "leaf" stages (leaf recruit and just leaf) we could change the leaf recruit to "sprout recruit" or just "sprout" to represent when the pikmin has come out of the onion but has not been plucked.

Idea #2 - The graphics of these badges are okay, but can still be improved.

Below is a picture of some badges I made that are graphically improved. Note that the leaf recruit badge has been changed to a sprout badge.


 * I like the new designs you presented. I should have the new versions up in a couple of minutes.

How to Obtain the Master Flower Rank
Is it true that Sir Pikmin and Peanut64 can only give out the Master Flower? Because I thought they only gave out the All Ranks. If this isn't true, we should change the page so that the other users know.

Yes, It is done.


 * That...was fast!

Okay.. and another question. How long is one reasonably long talk archive?


 * I know this is an old discussion, but I hate to leave you hanging (for another year). I'd say about 10 sections in the archive, with 10 sections on your normal talk page.


 * Also, on a different note, wouldn't it make more sense to put the master mud rank after the flower rank and before the master flower rank?

Is this protected?
Is this page protected so only admins can edit it? Because otherwise someone could change the requirements for being, well, any rank and immediately aquire that rank. It can always be rollbacked, but shouldn't this be changed before it occurs?

New Rank
Hey we should make a new rank. Tell me what you all think of my idea.

When it says sections on leaf rank...
When it says "Sections on the talk page" on how to become leaf-ranked, does it mean archives, or just discussions?


 * It means sections of a page, like this one; how it's titled "When it says sections on leaf rank...". Those are sections. They're made by writing ==(insert section name here)==, and more ='s can be added to make subsections. (Also: If a page has more than three sections, there's usually a table of contents at the top of the page, listing all sections in the page.) I hope this helps! 20:27, 26 September 2015 (EDT)

When it says...
In both, the last sentences of Flower and Master Flower sections when both say users are eligible for admin or bureaucrat roles when they reach those ranks, I really think we should take those last sentences down because some users (no offense) in those ranks sometimes don't show the sufficient amount of effort in their contributions nor trust in the community, indicating that they aren't entirely eligible nor prepared for those roles. But I feel like users who reach the "All Ranks" may be most prepared to use the advanced tools wisely since all users on the "All Ranks" rank have been contributing to the wiki for one year, those last sentences may be rearranged to the All Ranks section. What does everyone else think? Should we take those last sentences down from Flower and Master Flower and move them to All Ranks section? I say we should. 03:48, 16 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I agree. I'll do that immediately since our current active editors don't seem to pay much mind to our ranks system.

All ranks change
I think the "all ranks" rank should be changed to something like a gold-petaled flower, as it is a bit superfluous as it is now. 16:15, 5 November 2022 (UTC)