User talk:Cheepy-Cheepy

{|style="margin-top: 7px; background-color: white; border: 2px solid silver; width:100%;"
 * style="text-align:left;"|

Box Art
Ok, Box art, got it. I will do it more or less like you have explained, maybe let's talk about it on chat?

I haven't decided on the actual box art(sorry...) and I would like to talk about it on chat... if you don't mind. If you don't have time add some ideas to my talk page, please.

Infobox game
Ah, it appears I messed up the field inside of the if template. It's fixed now, thanks for telling me.-- En  Passant  13:26, 3 May 2016 (EDT)

Easy-peasy, just used an includeonly tag.-- En  Passant  00:56, 4 May 2016 (EDT)

Couple of tips
Thanks for taking the initiative to clean up the articles' categories! I just have a couple of little tips for you to remember.


 * When linking to categories, don't write "Category:Fire Enemies"; you want to lowercase "Enemies" so that it becomes "Category:Fire enemies" because it's not meant to be capitalized. See for more information. (Pikipedia's policy and help pages are really good; I use them a lot for doing things here on Fanon.)
 * Be sure not to add categories that are redundant. Since Category:Fire enemies is a subcategory of Category:Enemies, adding the latter to pages becomes redundant; i.e. it's unnecessary. The bottom-most category in a tree is preferred, also following Pikipedia's style.

If you've got any questions about this stuff, I'll be happy to answer them! But yeah, good work on the articles; sorry I haven't been helping out any. I'll do my share of the work. I mean, I am an admin, so I should be setting the example for other users. :P 11:59, 5 May 2016 (EDT)

Yeah, I understand. Well, I suppose you don't have to lowercase them, since we've got bigger fish to fry. We can come back to that issue later, since it's so small.

About my second point: Category:Enemies is a bigger and more general category than Category:Fire Enemies, okay? Because of that, you want to categorize articles into the most specific category they belong in. So, for instance, Fiery Blowhog would be categorized under Category:Fire Enemies, instead of Category:Enemies. Now, Category:Fire Enemies is a subcategory of Category:Enemies, which means that all the articles that are categorized under Category:Fire Enemies are essentially categorized under Category:Enemies, too. So because you've already got Fiery Blowhog categorized under Category:Fire Enemies, there isn't really any reason to add Category:Enemies to it.

Hope this helps! 19:00, 7 May 2016 (EDT)

I guess so, but it's still redundant. You should hop onto IRC so I can explain this stuff better to you. 19:15, 7 May 2016 (EDT)

Hey there!
Hey Cheepy, just wanted to say hello and that you're doing a wonderful job cleaning up the wiki!