PikminFanon:General content guidelines/vote: Difference between revisions
From Pikmin Fanon
Sir Pikmin (talk | contribs) (Voting for) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Subareas should be added, explaining that they are not mandatory, but could be used if the creator of an area wants to have their area very detailed... {{User:PikminFanatic23/Bulborbsig}} | Subareas should be added, explaining that they are not mandatory, but could be used if the creator of an area wants to have their area very detailed... {{User:PikminFanatic23/Bulborbsig}} | ||
:This is a policy, so it really just has the rules and shouldn't contain too much additional information. If you want to help me make the tutorial for area articles, that's where we would include it. {{User:Volatile Dweevil/Sig}} | :This is a policy, so it really just has the rules and shouldn't contain too much additional information. If you want to help me make the tutorial for area articles, that's where we would include it. {{User:Volatile Dweevil/Sig}} | ||
Oh... I just had an idea. Perhaps on the enemy format, there could be a section titled "Other", which has trivia and/or other interesting information. Does this sound good? {{User:PikminFanatic23/Bulborbsig}} | |||
Revision as of 00:35, 15 May 2012
Should we institute this policy?
For
Against
Comments
Subareas should be added, explaining that they are not mandatory, but could be used if the creator of an area wants to have their area very detailed... User:PikminFanatic23/Bulborbsig
- This is a policy, so it really just has the rules and shouldn't contain too much additional information. If you want to help me make the tutorial for area articles, that's where we would include it. User:Volatile Dweevil/Sig
Oh... I just had an idea. Perhaps on the enemy format, there could be a section titled "Other", which has trivia and/or other interesting information. Does this sound good? User:PikminFanatic23/Bulborbsig