Forum:Expanding coverage: Difference between revisions
MintyMoron64 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I mean, yeah. I guess so. I mean, every rom hack was once just an idea right? they're just more DEVELOPED (HA!) than ours. I think we should include them. {{User:Cyan piklord 64/sig}} | I mean, yeah. I guess so. I mean, every rom hack was once just an idea right? they're just more DEVELOPED (HA!) than ours. I think we should include them. {{User:Cyan piklord 64/sig}} | ||
Yes, I say we document those as well. ''[[Pikifen]]'' and ''[[Pikmin 251]]'' already have their articles, and, when I'm not occupied with other things on the wiki, I plan on making articles for three other ''Pikmin 2'' hacks I have knowledge of and have played through. {{User:Cheepy-Cheepy/sig}} | |||
Revision as of 17:47, 6 September 2021
- Forums: Index > Onion Complex > Expanding coverage
While working on the Nintendo Fanon Network project the idea of covering existing fan games / romhacks was brought up, and I think it is an interesting idea for Pikmin Fanon. I want to gather consensus on this idea because I myself am conflicted about it. What do you think? Should we cover fan games? Should we cover romhacks? Also, linking to these things would be out of the question. We would want to document, not provide access. People can Google these things easily. Anyways, leave your comments below. User:Peanut64/sig 14:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Comments
I mean, yeah. I guess so. I mean, every rom hack was once just an idea right? they're just more DEVELOPED (HA!) than ours. I think we should include them. User:Cyan piklord 64/sig
Yes, I say we document those as well. Pikifen and Pikmin 251 already have their articles, and, when I'm not occupied with other things on the wiki, I plan on making articles for three other Pikmin 2 hacks I have knowledge of and have played through. ~ 
Cheepy-Cheepy