Forum:Expanding coverage: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 01:42, 22 February 2024

Forums: Index > Onion Complex > Expanding coverage

While working on the Nintendo Fanon Network project the idea of covering existing fan games / romhacks was brought up, and I think it is an interesting idea for Pikmin Fanon. I want to gather consensus on this idea because I myself am conflicted about it. What do you think? Should we cover fan games? Should we cover romhacks? Also, linking to these things would be out of the question. We would want to document, not provide access. People can Google these things easily. Anyways, leave your comments below. Zoa dra Admin, Bureaucrat 14:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments

I mean, yeah. I guess so. I mean, every rom hack was once just an idea right? they're just more DEVELOPED (HA!) than ours. I think we should include them. I'm Minty Moron 64, and I like the Foundation Dweevil!

Yes, I say we document those as well. Pikifen and Pikmin 251 already have their articles, and, when I'm not occupied with other things on the wiki, I plan on making articles for three other Pikmin 2 hacks I have knowledge of and have played through. ~ Cheepy-Cheepy

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 ==Comments==
-I mean, yeah. I guess so. I mean, every rom hack was once just an idea right? they're just more DEVELOPED (HA!) than ours. I think we should include them. {{User:Cyan piklord 64/sig}}
+I mean, yeah. I guess so. I mean, every rom hack was once just an idea right? they're just more DEVELOPED (HA!) than ours. I think we should include them. {{User:MintyMoron64/sig}}
 :Yes, I say we document those as well. ''[[Pikifen]]'' and ''[[Pikmin 251]]'' already have their articles, and, when I'm not occupied with other things on the wiki, I plan on making articles for three other ''Pikmin 2'' hacks I have knowledge of and have played through. {{User:Cheepy-Cheepy/sig}}